Comments on: Threesomes Within a Christian Marriage

By: Jacob

Jacob — Wed, 03 Dec 2008 06:05:28 +0000

That's fine, except Paul is not Jesus or God, he's a human and open to making mistakes. Personally, I would say it is immoral to have two wives, or one wife and a lover, but I can't speak for everyone. Obviously we live in different times from the old days where it was acceptable to treat women like property. It seems some of the people commenting here believe that is enough justification to have a threesome. I would disagree. However, it's very hard for me to believe that if a man and two women are all in agreement about a threesome, that it should be considered adultery. I do think the normal rules about homosexuality should apply. It would not be right for two men to have sex while the woman watched, but one man alternating between two women seems like it fits within the bounds of Christianity quite well.

By: Jonathan

Jonathan — Tue, 02 Dec 2008 05:19:32 +0000

I cannot find anything against it except where paul asks preachers and teachers to be men of one wife.

By: Shaneen Clarke

Shaneen Clarke — Thu, 20 Nov 2008 03:59:30 +0000

They should have trust in the first place as a foundation on any relationship.

By: placidwater

placidwater — Sat, 11 Oct 2008 03:07:26 +0000

Jesus was a big fan of the commandment to “Love thy neighbor as thyself” (Matthew 22:39).

So, if you got two neighbors … what’s the problem?

By: farkinga

farkinga — Fri, 10 Oct 2008 21:08:20 +0000

Here’s the thing about the Bible…

There are those people who say it is the word of God, which is a pretty interesting proposition since it has implications for how able humans are to understand it.

There are those who say it is an inspired work written by humans, which also has interesting consequences: specifically that the humans who wrote the “New Testament” did so about 1800 years ago, and the world they wrote about isn’t the world we live in anymore.

There are those who say the Bible must be “interpreted literally,” but this is clearly oxymoronic because the 12th century practice of Scholasticism ultimately showed that people can differ in their literal interpretations.

There are those who say the Bible cannot be understood by lay-people. These people chose to read from the Bible in Latin even if no one actually understood Latin anymore.

There are those who say the Bible can be interpreted by the reader, a la Luther and Gutenberg.

There are those who consider the Bible to be a viral cultural artifact based on a superstition created by a guy named Abraham.

There are those who translate and transcribe the Bible from one language to another, thereby introducing an invisible editorial hand that interprets and sometimes makes errors.

There are those who see the Bible as a political document, like Emperor Constantine in 325AD, who convened the first Council of Nicaea (which established the canonical 4-book Gospel).

… and there are those who wrote Gospels that were mostly forgotten by time (but just might have made it into the Apocrypha).

There are those who consider “King James” to have created the definitive Bible, although this was written in 1611. …and there are those who consider King James to have himself altered the Bible, and have created newer translations from source documentation.

I’m not sure where you fit in, but it’s interesting it seems that you believe you know the correct interpretation of the Bible.

So… which one is it? …because I don’t claim to know.

By: Jeff

Jeff — Fri, 10 Oct 2008 16:47:13 +0000

This is absolutely ridiculous and a perversion of solid biblical teaching. Shame on whoever wrote this.

By: anon

anon — Wed, 08 Oct 2008 20:21:27 +0000

What if the spouse is there and into it? If everyone agrees, how is it adultery? Also, the old testament talks of a few important men who had multiple wives, such as Abraham. Since we are talking specifically about Christianity here, I’ll also mention the Mormons. Is it adultery to have a threesome with your two wives?

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Mon, 15 Sep 2008 22:51:48 +0000

It is a sin to have sex outside of your spouse whether you be male or female. It’s in the Bible and you can’t change it to be what you want it to be. Don’t get married if you plan to be an adulterer.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Fri, 18 Jul 2008 13:33:04 +0000

You might as well admit that what you want to do is have a rollickin’ good time and stop pretending that it can fit with ‘Christianity’. I mean, go for it…stop being afraid!

By: Porn » Threesomes Within a Christian Marriage

Porn » Threesomes Within a Christian Marriage — Sat, 22 Sep 2007 07:26:56 +0000

[...] admin wrote an interesting post today onHere’s a quick excerpt(2) Both women involved in the threesome must be willing to keep within traditional female roles (ie, not taking on masculine appearance or behavior in or out of the bedroom) and recognize the male as the leader in the relationship. … [...]