Archive for 2008/04/01

UNdata now searches over 55 million records.

2008/04/01/2236

RTFA: http://data.un.org/

Indicator databases
- Key Global Indicators
- Millennium Development Goals Indicators
- Gender Statistics
- ECE Database
Agriculture
- FAO Statistics
Education
- UNESCO Statistics
Employment
- ILO Statistics
Energy
- Energy Statistics
Environment
- UNFCCC Statistics
Health
- WHO Statistics
Human Development
- UNDP Statistics
Industry
- Industry Statistics
Information and Communication Technology
- ITU Statistics
National Accounts
- Official Country Data
- Estimates of Main Aggregates
Population
- Demographic Statistics
- Estimates and Projections
Refugees
- UNHCR Statistics
Trade
- Commodity Trade Statistics
Tourism
- UNWTO Statistics

Imagine taking all of the data in every UN publication, and making an easy interface to query and download that data. STOP! Your imagination is wasted, because this already exists.

*drool* so much data… UNdata exists, and it rules. The AJAX-ified interface is really responsive, and defnitely makes it a painless task to drill down. The available data sets are vast, including all sorts of great economic data from the IMF and WTO.

Via information aesthetics.

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] Sphere: Related Content

FLASHBACK: Philadelphia Inquirer, February 7, 1993

2008/04/01/1248

RTFA: http://www.mathsci.appstate.edu/~sjg/class/1010/wc…

In 1785 a French mathematician named Charles-Joseph Mathon de la Cour wrote a parody of Franklins Poor Richard called Fortunate Richard in which he mocked the unbearable spirit of American optimism represented by Franklin. The Frenchman wrote a piece about Fortunate Richard leaving a small sum of money in his will to be used only after it had collected interest for 500 years.

Fat chance someone would be dumb enough to try that. Ha. Ha.

Franklin, who was 79 years old at the time, wrote back to the Frenchman, thanking him for a great idea and telling him that he had decided to leave a bequest to his native Boston and his adopted Philadelphia of 1,000 pounds to each on the condition that it be placed in a fund that would gather interest over a period of 200 years.

The rest, as they say, is history, an ongoing volume that turned another page last month when a judge in Philadelphia Orphans Court issued a decree regarding the distribution of the 2,256,952.05 that had accumulated in Franklins Philadelphia trust since his death in 1790.

The court appointed Center City lawyer Gerard J. St. John to be the master in this matter. It was his duty to make sure that the final distribution of the money was in keeping with Franklins intentions. And Franklins intentions have been a source of controversy from the very beginning, resulting in two entirely different versions of the fund in Boston and Philadelphia.

One obvious difference was the bottom line. Franklins Boston trust fund, which is tied up in the Massachusetts courts, is worth almost 5 million, more than twice the amount that has accumulated in the Philadelphia trust fund.

“Boston has always prided itself that it compounded the money wisely. Philadelphia has always had an inferiority complex because it didnt,” said Bruce Yenawine, a Syracuse University Ph.D. candidate in history who has spent years researching the Franklin funds in both cities. “But Boston decided to minimize risks and maximize proceeds. Philadelphia, on the other hand, focused on the other side of Franklins instructions by loaning the money to individuals. I think thats more in keeping with what Franklin wanted.”

Franklin stipulated that the 1,000 pounds the equivalent of 4,444 be invested and used to provide low-interest loans to “married tradesmen under the age of 26″ to get them started in business. Over the 200-year life of the trust, money from the Philadelphia fund was loaned to hundreds of individuals, mostly for home mortgages during the last 50 years. Boston, meanwhile, invested the bulk of the money in a trust fund that Yenawine describes as “a savings company for the rich.”

Needless to say, trying to give a modern and accurate interpretation to Franklins intentions based on the language of his will was no piece of cake. It was a pain in the butt at first, but after a while I got caught up in it,” said St. John, the lawyer who was appointed to represent Franklins interests. “What astonished me in reading his will was how much energy, intelligence and vigor came through after 200 years. I began to have a greater appreciation for Franklins place in history.”

I stumbled across this article and thought I’d share.

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] Sphere: Related Content

TED | Talks | Siegfried Woldhek: The true face of Leonardo Da Vinci? (video)

2008/04/01/1232

RTFA: http://www.ted.com/talks/view/id/235

Leonardo Da Vinci’s life and work is well known — but his own face is not. Illustrator and activist Siegfried Woldhek used some thoughtful image-analysis techniques to find what he believes is the true face of Leonardo. Here, he walks viewers through exactly how he did it.

Siegfried Woldhek knows faces — he’s drawn more than 1,100 of them. Using sophisticated image…

Wow! This 4-minute video packs an amazing punch: the identity of Da Vinci. It’s a wonderful story that ties together several historic images, of and by Da Vinci. In the end of the day, of course, it’s a matter of choosing to believe Woldhek’s analysis or not…

But if Woldhek is right, then this constitutes astonishing reality-hacking. Da Vinci made himself into THE symbol of all humanity through his most famous self-portrait: The Vitruvian Man. The image perfectly and implicitly contains critical information about the proportions of the human body (ensuring its lasting utility in understanding humans), while simultaneously being conspicuously tagged in the most identifying way possible.

The Vitruvian Man isn’t just “some dude.” It’s Da Vinco, himself! It’s such an epic hack by virtue of lurking in obscurity for so many centuries, and by virtue of how deeply the image embedded itself into our culture. WOW.

Via boingboing.

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] Sphere: Related Content